On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:06:33AM +0800, .贺鹏 wrote:
> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is 
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:57 PM Simon Horman <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 08:15:03PM +0800, hepeng.0320 wrote:
> > > when running ovs-tcpdump -i ethX and the port is used as the incomming 
> > > port for a vxlan port.
> > >
> > > The callstack for the upcall:
> > >
> > > mirror_ingress_packet
> > > mirror_packet
> > > output_normal
> > > compose_output_action
> > > compose_output_action__
> > > terminate_native_tunnel
> > >
> > > will xlate the action into a tnl_pop action, not an output action to the
> > > mirror port. So eventually the translated actions will be 'tnl_pop(x), 
> > > tnl_pop(x)'.
> > > However, the right action should be '(mirror port), tnl_pop(x)'
> > >
> > > This patch adds a flag in xlate_ctx indicating the current output_normal
> > > is used by mirroring. Note that we cannot use ctx->mirrors as the
> > > indicator as in the mirror code, the ctx->mirrors will not be cleared
> > > after mirror action finished.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: hepeng.0320 <[email protected]>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch appears to have gone stale - no response in the best part of
> > three years.
> >
> > Accordingly, I am marking it as Changes Requested in patchwork
> > (I'm still searching for the best status for such cases).
> 
> IIRC, there is another patch which has already been merged. It solves
> the same problem through another approach.
> Although I am not sure its approach works in every situation, the
> problem stated in the comments should have
> been solved.
> 
> I think you can drop the patch.

Thanks, I've marked it as "Not Applicable".
We can always revisit this if it turns out to be necessary.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to