On 22 Mar 2024, at 20:06, Aaron Conole wrote:

> Open vSwitch is originally intended to switch at layer 2, only dealing with
> Ethernet frames.  With the introduction of l3 tunnels support, it crossed
> into the realm of needing to care a bit about some routing details when
> making forwarding decisions.  If an oversized packet would need to be
> fragmented during this forwarding decision, there is a chance for pmtu
> to get involved and generate a routing exception.  This is gated by the
> skbuff->pkt_type field.
>
> When a flow is already loaded into the openvswitch module this field is
> set up and transitioned properly as a packet moves from one port to
> another.  In the case that a packet execute is invoked after a flow is
> newly installed this field is not properly initialized.  This causes the
> pmtud mechanism to omit sending the required exception messages across
> the tunnel boundary and a second attempt needs to be made to make sure
> that the routing exception is properly setup.  To fix this, we set the
> outgoing packet's pkt_type to PACKET_OUTGOING, since it can only get
> to the openvswitch module via a port device or packet command.

Is this not a problem when the packet comes from the bridge port in the kernel?

> This issue is periodically encountered in complex setups, such as large
> openshift deployments, where multiple sets of tunnel traversal occurs.
> A way to recreate this is with the ovn-heater project that can setup
> a networking environment which mimics such large deployments.  In that
> environment, without this patch, we can see:
>
>   ./ovn_cluster.sh start
>   podman exec ovn-chassis-1 ip r a 170.168.0.5/32 dev eth1 mtu 1200
>   podman exec ovn-chassis-1 ip netns exec sw01p1  ip r flush cache
>   podman exec ovn-chassis-1 ip netns exec sw01p1 ping 21.0.0.3 -M do -s 1300 
> -c2
>   PING 21.0.0.3 (21.0.0.3) 1300(1328) bytes of data.
>   From 21.0.0.3 icmp_seq=2 Frag needed and DF set (mtu = 1142)
>
>   --- 21.0.0.3 ping statistics ---
>   2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1017ms
>
> Using tcpdump, we can also see the expected ICMP FRAG_NEEDED message is not
> sent into the server.
>
> With this patch, setting the pkt_type, we see the following:
>
>   podman exec ovn-chassis-1 ip netns exec sw01p1 ping 21.0.0.3 -M do -s 1300 
> -c2
>   PING 21.0.0.3 (21.0.0.3) 1300(1328) bytes of data.
>   From 21.0.0.3 icmp_seq=1 Frag needed and DF set (mtu = 1222)
>   ping: local error: message too long, mtu=1222
>
>   --- 21.0.0.3 ping statistics ---
>   2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1061ms
>
> In this case, the first ping request receives the FRAG_NEEDED message and
> a local routing exception is created.
>
> Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-164
> Fixes: 58264848a5a7 ("openvswitch: Add vxlan tunneling support.")
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
> ---
> NOTE: An alternate approach would be to add a netlink attribute to preserve
>       pkt_type across the kernel->user boundary, but that does require some
>       userspace cooperation.

I prefer the method in this patch, as it requires no userspace change, i.e. it 
will work even with older versions of OVS without the need for backports.

>  net/openvswitch/actions.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/actions.c b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
> index 6fcd7e2ca81fe..952c6292100d0 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/actions.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
> @@ -936,6 +936,8 @@ static void do_output(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff 
> *skb, int out_port,
>                               pskb_trim(skb, ovs_mac_header_len(key));
>               }
>
> +             skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OUTGOING;
> +

Maybe add a comment based on the large explanation above?

>               if (likely(!mru ||
>                          (skb->len <= mru + vport->dev->hard_header_len))) {
>                       ovs_vport_send(vport, skb, ovs_key_mac_proto(key));
> -- 
> 2.41.0

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to