On 6/19/24 23:00, Adrian Moreno wrote: > Although not explicitly documented in the psample module itself, the > definition of PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE seems inherited from act_sample. > > Quoting tc-sample(8): > "RATE of 100 will lead to an average of one sampled packet out of every > 100 observed." > > With this semantics, the rates that we can express with an unsigned > 32-bits number are very unevenly distributed and concentrated towards > "sampling few packets". > For example, we can express a probability of 2.32E-8% but we > cannot express anything between 100% and 50%. > > For sampling applications that are capable of sampling a decent > amount of packets, this sampling rate semantics is not very useful. > > Add a new flag to the uAPI that indicates that the sampling rate is > expressed in scaled probability, this is: > - 0 is 0% probability, no packets get sampled. > - U32_MAX is 100% probability, all packets get sampled. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <[email protected]> > --- > include/net/psample.h | 3 ++- > include/uapi/linux/psample.h | 10 +++++++++- > include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h | 1 + > net/psample/psample.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/psample.h b/include/net/psample.h > index 2ac71260a546..c52e9ebd88dd 100644 > --- a/include/net/psample.h > +++ b/include/net/psample.h > @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ struct psample_metadata { > u8 out_tc_valid:1, > out_tc_occ_valid:1, > latency_valid:1, > - unused:5; > + rate_as_probability:1, > + unused:4; > const u8 *user_cookie; > u32 user_cookie_len; > }; > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/psample.h b/include/uapi/linux/psample.h > index e80637e1d97b..b765f0e81f20 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/psample.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/psample.h > @@ -8,7 +8,11 @@ enum { > PSAMPLE_ATTR_ORIGSIZE, > PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_GROUP, > PSAMPLE_ATTR_GROUP_SEQ, > - PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE, > + PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE, /* u32, ratio between observed and > + * sampled packets or scaled probability > + * if PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_PROBABILITY > + * is set. > + */ > PSAMPLE_ATTR_DATA, > PSAMPLE_ATTR_GROUP_REFCOUNT, > PSAMPLE_ATTR_TUNNEL, > @@ -20,6 +24,10 @@ enum { > PSAMPLE_ATTR_TIMESTAMP, /* u64, nanoseconds */ > PSAMPLE_ATTR_PROTO, /* u16 */ > PSAMPLE_ATTR_USER_COOKIE, /* binary, user provided data */ > + PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_PROBABILITY,/* no argument, interpret rate in > + * PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE as a > + * probability scaled 0 - U32_MAX. > + */ > > __PSAMPLE_ATTR_MAX > }; > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h > b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h > index fee1bcc20793..7ee0735e7b38 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum { > TCA_SAMPLE_TRUNC_SIZE, > TCA_SAMPLE_PSAMPLE_GROUP, > TCA_SAMPLE_PAD, > + TCA_SAMPLE_PROBABILITY, > __TCA_SAMPLE_MAX > }; > #define TCA_SAMPLE_MAX (__TCA_SAMPLE_MAX - 1)
Not a full review yet, but this hunk seems unrelated to the set as you're not adding rate_as_probability to act_sample. I suppose, it was part of the plan at some point, but then Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
