On 12/12/24 10:46 AM, Ales Musil wrote: > In case of LB having client as VIP and lb_force_snat_ip being set > to specific IP we would SNAT the reply traffic for the load balancer. > That was caused by premature unDNAT due to the client IP being > LB VIP with combination of match for SNAT that was checking only > the flag "force_snat_for_lb == 1". > > Add match to ensure that the reply traffic is not being sent to SNAT. > > Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-1009 > Signed-off-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> > ---
Thanks, Ales! Applied to main and 24.09. The 24.03 backport had quite a few conflicts (mostly tests). I'll try to fix that tomorrow. Regards, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
