On 1/16/25 11:11 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote: > On 12/12/24 10:46 AM, Ales Musil wrote: >> In case of LB having client as VIP and lb_force_snat_ip being set >> to specific IP we would SNAT the reply traffic for the load balancer. >> That was caused by premature unDNAT due to the client IP being >> LB VIP with combination of match for SNAT that was checking only >> the flag "force_snat_for_lb == 1". >> >> Add match to ensure that the reply traffic is not being sent to SNAT. >> >> Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-1009 >> Signed-off-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> >> --- > > Thanks, Ales! Applied to main and 24.09. The 24.03 backport had quite > a few conflicts (mostly tests). I'll try to fix that tomorrow. >
Applied to 24.03 too. Regards, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
