On 2/26/25 16:30, Felix Huettner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 03:44:52PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote: >> A peer of a switch can be another switch, so the port type has to be >> checked. The missing check doesn't seem to lead to crashes, but it >> leads to addresses of switch-switch ports not being advertised. >> >> Fix that by checking the port type instead of assuming. >> >> The issue is a result of two features being developed at the same time >> and the code not being re-checked before merging the routing patches. > > Thanks a lot, thats a nice one. > > Acked-by: Felix Huettner <felix.huettner@stackit.cloud>
BTW, this code also advertises addresses of remote ports in case of interconnect, IIUC. Is that supposed to be happening? Or should we not advertise them, as they are not local to the AZ? Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
