On 3/17/25 6:34 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 3/9/25 3:46 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> exec_actions_level is a per-CPU integer allocated at compile time.
>> action_fifos and flow_keys are per-CPU pointer and have their data
>> allocated at module init time.
>> There is no gain in splitting it, once the module is allocated, the
>> structures are allocated.
>>
>> Merge the three per-CPU variables into ovs_action, adapt callers.
>>
>> Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@ovn.org>
>> Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>> net/openvswitch/actions.c | 49 +++++++++++++-------------------------
>> net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 9 +------
>> net/openvswitch/datapath.h | 3 ---
>> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/actions.c b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
>> index 704c858cf2093..322ca7b30c3bc 100644
>> --- a/net/openvswitch/actions.c
>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
>> @@ -78,17 +78,22 @@ struct action_flow_keys {
>> struct sw_flow_key key[OVS_DEFERRED_ACTION_THRESHOLD];
>> };
>>
>> -static struct action_fifo __percpu *action_fifos;
>> -static struct action_flow_keys __percpu *flow_keys;
>> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, exec_actions_level);
>> +struct ovs_action {
>> + struct action_fifo action_fifos;
>> + struct action_flow_keys flow_keys;
>> + int exec_level;
>> +};
>
> I have the feeling this is not a very good name, as 'OVS action' has a
> quite specific meaning, not really matched here.
>
> Also more OVS people, as Pravin is not really active anymore.
FTR, I'm processing the PW backlog in sequence (and with latency...),
and I see only now this point has been discussed in the next patch.
Sorry for the noise.
/P
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
