The openflow-discuss mailing list archives at mailman.stanford.edu appear
to be offline. So use mail-archive.com URLs instead.

Flagged by make check-docs.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@ovn.org>
--
Changes in v2:
- The make target is "check-docs" (David Marchand)
- Don't break formatting (David Marchand)
- Use mail-archive.com instead of archive.org (Ilya Maximents)
---
 Documentation/topics/design.rst  | 2 +-
 Documentation/topics/porting.rst | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/topics/design.rst b/Documentation/topics/design.rst
index 656d60673e98..f08107c02efa 100644
--- a/Documentation/topics/design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/topics/design.rst
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ is, the first byte of the encapsulated frame immediately 
follows the
 same way for compatibility.
 
 For an earlier discussion, please see the thread archived at:
-https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-August/002604.html
+https://www.mail-archive.com/openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu/msg00663.html
 
 [*] The quoted definition is directly from OF1.1.  Definitions used inside OVS
 omit the 8-byte ``ofp_header`` members, so the sizes in this discussion are
diff --git a/Documentation/topics/porting.rst b/Documentation/topics/porting.rst
index b627fde12607..bbcb0c3e967a 100644
--- a/Documentation/topics/porting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/topics/porting.rst
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ packet to software, slowing down not just UDPv6 but all 
IPv6 processing.
 
 .. [1] Aaron Rosen, "Modify packet fields extremely slow",
     openflow-discuss mailing list, June 26, 2011, archived at
-    
https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-June/002386.html.
+    
https://www.mail-archive.com/openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu/msg00447.html
 
 Questions
 ---------

-- 
2.47.2

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to