On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:07 AM Simon Horman <ho...@ovn.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:46:48AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > Update some URLs in documentation that are broken to working URLs > > to the same information. > > > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Removed duplicate word "commit" from patch description (David Marchand) > > - The make target is "check-docs" (David Marchand) > > - Don't break formatting (David Marchand) > > - Use mail-archive.com instead of archive.org (Ilya Maximents) > > - Collected reviewed-by tag from David Marchand > > > > --- > > Simon Horman (2): > > Documentation: Update links to DPDK documentation. > > Documentation: Use mail-archive.com URLs for openflow-discuss ML > > links. > > > > Documentation/topics/design.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst | 4 ++-- > > Documentation/topics/porting.rst | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > base-commit: 50dfd1ce32dff9e400ab1fdc0ef26f83f5299429 > > Thanks David and Eelco for your review. > > I have applied this series to main. > > - Documentation: Use mail-archive.com URLs for openflow-discuss ML links. > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/effb2bb286cf > - Documentation: Update links to DPDK documentation. > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/88ee8ae0542f > > I was also able to trivially backport the DPDK documentation update to > branch-3.5, and the openflow-discuss documentation update all the way back > to branch-3.0. However, I am not sure if applying documentation updates of > this nature to branch-* is appropriate. I'd appreciate some feedback on > that.
It won't hurt to backport those. On the other hand, we don't generate documentation for older branches, do we? -- David Marchand _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
