-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 4:08 PM
To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
Cc: James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com>, "b...@openvswitch.org" 
<b...@openvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 1213 
1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed

    On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:26:38PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote:
    > 
    > 
    > From: <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of James Page 
<james.p...@ubuntu.com>
    > Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 2:49 AM
    > To: "b...@openvswitch.org" <b...@openvswitch.org>
    > Subject: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 1213 
1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed
    > 
    > Hi
    > 
    > I'm cutting builds from branch-2.8 in preparation for the ovs 2.8.0 
release for Ubuntu; we build and test two sets of binaries - a vanilla one and 
one with dpdk enabled.
    > 
    > I see test failures on all of the "ofproto-dpif - conntrack" tests with 
the DPDK build and with the ovn ACL test (see attached logs).  Vanilla build is 
fine.
    > 
    > James
    > 
    > These are generic tests and should not be run with-dpdk set.
    > If you run these tests --with-dpdk, some tests will consider the packets 
coming an actual dpdk interface, which they are not.
    > In this case, the packets will be marked with a bad checksum.
    
    All of the tests in the testsuite should always pass, or be skipped,
    regardless of configuration, so if some of the tests are inappropriate
    for a given configuration then they need AT_SKIP_IF([...]) to ensure
    that they get skipped.
    
sure; that is why I sent the patch.





_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to