Yes. Companies should block Facebook and Twitter. Facebook is wasting time and bandwidth, because most of its component cannot be cached, as most of it is dynamically generated.
Twitter is also wasting bandwidth, if the client is keep refreshing the tweet, because it cannot be cached. LinkedIn is OK, because the data there is mostly static. I have experience maintaining a Squid cache server, and found that more than 80% of the traffic is not cacheable due to 20% of the application (Facebook and Twitter). See Pareto principle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Mohd Fazli Azran <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi guy!!, > > Long time not write something for your. Just wanna to share about this > article. It about *"Should companies block Facebook, Twitter and > LinkedIn?" . *Should your open or block for Social network. It up to you > guy. On this article give some opinion. > > > www.networkworld.com/community/tech-debate-block-social-networks?source=NWWNLE_nlt_daily_pm_2010-07-13 > > Regards, > Mohd Fazli Azran > OWASP Malaysia Chapter Leader > [image: OWASP Malaysia] <http://www.owasp.org/Malaysia> > > _______________________________________________ > Owasp-Malaysia mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-malaysia > > OWASP Malaysia Wiki > http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Malaysia > > OWASP Malaysia Wiki Facebook > http://www.facebook.com/pages/OWASP-Malaysia-Local-Chapter/295989208420 > -- Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan
_______________________________________________ Owasp-Malaysia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-malaysia OWASP Malaysia Wiki http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Malaysia OWASP Malaysia Wiki Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/OWASP-Malaysia-Local-Chapter/295989208420
