Manuel On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:56:31AM +0000, Leos Rivas Manuel wrote: > Maybe you can have a rule before this to check &variable eq 0 and skip the > rule
I guess so. But I wrote the default as empty variable and not non-existing variable. So I thought I would skip the "&variable eq 0". > but the cost of macro expansion in your @within against that very > simple regex should be very low, especially if you compare it to > other rules with multiple capturing +100 long regex ;) Yes. Think so too. And maybe there is even special code in pcre to reduce the costs of ^$. Ahoj, Christian -- If you have men who will only come if they know there is a good road, I don't want them. I want men who will come if there is no road at all. -- David Livingstone _______________________________________________ Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set
