@Alban, This is a publicly available mailing list - you may unsubscribe
yourself.

On 2/22/16, 8:49 AM, "Alban Gernigon" <alban.gerni...@corp.ovh.com> wrote:

>Unsubscribe me please
>
>
>
>
>Le 22/02/2016 14:39, «
>owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set-boun...@lists.owasp.org au nom de Chaim
>Sanders » <owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set-boun...@lists.owasp.org au nom
>de csand...@trustwave.com> a écrit :
>
>>This is actually surprising new information to me (and apparently Ryan as
>>he wrote the rule). This really does show the value of going back over
>>these rules. With this in mind I do think that we should definitely place
>>this in paranoid mode as my whole basis for not doing so was that it
>>never
>>triggered. I have also merged your changes
>>
>>On 2/18/16, 5:03 AM,
>>"owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set-boun...@lists.owasp.org on behalf of
>>Christian Folini"
>><owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set-boun...@lists.owasp.org
>>on behalf of christian.fol...@netnea.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Manuel
>>>
>>>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:56:31AM +0000, Leos Rivas Manuel wrote:
>>>> Maybe you can have a rule before this to check &variable eq 0 and skip
>>>>the rule
>>>
>>>I guess so. But I wrote the default as empty variable and not
>>>non-existing variable. So I thought I would skip the "&variable eq 0".
>>>
>>>> but the cost of macro expansion in your @within against that very
>>>> simple regex should be very low, especially if you compare it to
>>>> other rules with multiple capturing +100 long regex ;)
>>>
>>>Yes. Think so too. And maybe there is even special code in pcre to
>>>reduce the costs of ^$.
>>>
>>>Ahoj,
>>>
>>>Christian
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>If you have men who will only come if they know there is a good road,
>>>I don't want them. I want men who will come if there is no road at all.
>>>-- David Livingstone
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list
>>>Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
>>>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=95zF1uCB2ZJfe9yLcH9VyKahmVYtxCoL
>>>Tv
>>>06aa44Mw&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2flists%2eowasp%2eorg%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2f
>>>ow
>>>asp-modsecurity-core-rule-set
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
>>confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
>>are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained
>>herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you
>>received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the
>>sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic
>>or hard copy format.
>>_______________________________________________
>>Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list
>>Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
>>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=2ZHL1mJMsaHjgmZkgZnxexZ2LEZGqfYdt
>>IOdPJHG6Q&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2flists%2eowasp%2eorg%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2f
>>owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set


________________________________

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format.
_______________________________________________
Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list
Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set

Reply via email to