Hello!
Eric will probably react properly at this, but AAG has never really followed
anyone's standards, except their own. There are also complaints regarding
their products not, that's right not, working with software from other
vendors.

Whereas, the Hobby Boards products have a very good track record of working
with everyone's software. And this does include ours, in fact it would be
proper to say that ours is what spurred the creation of Hobby Board's great
ideas, but that's my opinion only.

Historically, Maxim has shied away from a working standard regarding the way
to connect to the hardware. They do ship things with RJ11 devices attached,
and normally we would create something to translate from one to the other.

Tom a suggestion, it should then includes both. And then make it a jumper
supported option.
--
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The Force will be with you always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Vickery
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 3:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] 1WRJ45 Standard(?)

iButtonLink uses a wiring scheme that is compatible with ours but AAG
doesn't. They only use RJ11 connectors and I don't think all of their
products have the same pinout.

Eric
www.hobby-boards.com

Paul Alfille wrote: 
As far a I can tell, Maxim doesn't make a product with RJ45. All their kits
are RJ11.

You probably should follow HobbyBoard's wiring scheme
http://hobby-boards.com/catalog/howto_wiring_diagram.php

iButtonlink seems compatible with this, as does AAG from my experience.

Paul Alfille
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working with a company on an embedded device that will include an RJ45
jack to interface to 1-Wire sensors.  I'm wondering just how much of a
standard 1WRJ45 became after it was proposed.  Who manufactures the majority
of 1-Wire sensor assemblies, and what pinouts have they followed? 

At the moment, we're planning to follow the Dallas RJ11/RJ12 standard, but
just use the RJ45 jack on our board with the outer two pins unconnected.
 (We're using RJ45 instead of RJ11 because the board can be configured with
a serial port or 1-Wire on the RJ45 jack).
-Tom





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javao
ne



_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
  


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to