On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Johan <[email protected]> wrote: > Then one more question (sorry for multiple items). It was not clear to
That's ok, but multiple responses > me which libusb version I should use, I finally got it working with the > compatibility layer version, so is 1.0 known not to work? > This is what I found in the FAQ: > (current version 0.18, though 0.17 is known to work) > But these version number does not match at all what you can download > today (1.0 or Legacy release 0.1.12 + compatibility version). Well, libusb is strange. The 0.1X branch has been around for a long time, and is available on BSD Mac and Windows as well. The 1.X is a total rework that (last I checked about a year ago) was still mostly being planned and designed. There was interest in having a compatibility layer. I agree the naming makes it look like we are using deprecated libraries. I could look at the 1.X library again, but I'm not sure if it really helps us. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
