On 11/09/2011 01:06 PM, Paul Alfille wrote:

> OWFS checks CRC16 for many of the Maxim and third party 1-wire slaves.
> It's a trivial burden on the host. (This includes the 1921 1923 1954
> 2406 2408 2423 2450 2502 2405 2506 2804 2810, BAE0910 BAE0911 ...)
>
> In general, any transmission error triggers a repeat attempt (actually 2
> repeats). Of course that might cause your slave to re-sense the value
> which might be slow.

Thanks for the good insight, Paul; I'll look at some of these devices 
you mention to see how things are implemented there. It seems like using 
CRCs might be the best option. I'll have to see if my microcontroller 
can compute the CRCs quickly enough...

Cheers,

Eloy Paris.-

>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Eloy Paris <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     code since if option (2) is chosen then OWFS would need to either
>     generate a CRC (when sending data to the sensor), or check a CRC (when
>     receiving data from the sensor).
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to