Is there a bug in 2.8p13?

I have a DS9490R USB adapter and cannot change any of the settings.  I 
have tried all of the timeout settings and the unit settings, changing 
via the webpage.  Anything I change immediately goes back to the default 
value.  I did wonder if my adapter was faulty so I bought another and it 
is just the same.

Running owhttpd with debug, and changing settings/timeout/volatile to 10 
this is what I see -

    CALL: owhttpd_handler.c:handle_socket(60) PreParse line=GET 
/favicon.ico HTTP/1.1

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:URLparse(314) URL parse file=/favicon.ico, 
request=, value=
    CALL: owhttpd_handler.c:handle_socket(68) WLcmd: GET    file: 
/favicon.ico    request:     value:     version: HTTP/1.1
   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:handle_socket(80) http icon request.
   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:Host: localhost:3000

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:User-Agent: 
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:Accept: 
text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:Accept-Language: 
en-gb,en;q=0.5

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:Accept-Encoding: 
gzip, deflate

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:Connection: keep-alive

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:If-Modified-Since: 
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:22:43 GMT

   DEBUG: owhttpd_handler.c:ReadToCRLF(347) More data:

   DEBUG: ow_net_server.c:ProcessAcceptSocket(236) Normal exit.


Is there a bug or am I doing something wrong here?
Thanks
Mick

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to