Hi Steinar,

I've had a little experience using the Hobby Boards new humidity sensor.
While I haven't been able to test the sensor in high humidity conditions
(I've only been using it inside), the temperature reading is does produce
seems a little different from a DS1820.
In my case however, the humidity sensor is reading less than the DS1820 (it
varies between 0.5 to 1 degC).

I also cannot update the polling frequency through owfs by writing to the
the polling_frequency file. I think it should work, but suspect there is a
bug in the owfs software.
The only way I have successfully updated the polling frequency is by using
the HBviewer software available on the Hobby Boards web site:

http://www.hobby-boards.com/store/pages.php?pageid=14

However, It only runs on Windows and you'll also need to install a 1-wire
driver, which is also available from the Hobby Boards web site.

Hope this helps.

David

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Steinar Midtskogen <stei...@latinitas.org>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> It's probably not an owfs problem, but perhaps people here have some
> experience with the new humidity sensor from Hobby Boards.  It seems to
> work fine with the latest owserver, but the readings seem a bit low.
> It's heavy fog and rain outside (i.e. 100%), but I only get 80-85%.  The
> temperature is about 5C.  Indoor I got about 40% which probably is about
> right, so it does react to humidity.  Has anyone seen something similar?
>
> Also, the temperature reading is about one degree C higher than the
> DS1820 sensors I have at the same place.  Does it generate internal
> heat?  I'm using the standard HB enclosure.  The venting holes do seem a
> bit small.
>
> An issue which is owfs related: Is it possible to change the polling
> frequency?
>
> # owget -s 3000 /EF.90A020150000/humidity/polling_available
>          255
> # owget -s 3000 EF.90A020150000/humidity/polling_frequency
>            2
> # owwrite -s 3000 EF.90A020150000/humidity/polling_frequency 1
> # owget -s 3000 EF.90A020150000/humidity/polling_frequency
>            2
>
> Shouldn't this work?
>
> --
> Steinar
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Owfs-developers mailing list
> Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to