On 16/03/16 21:02, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
> On 03/16/16 00:00, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>>
>> On 03/15/16 04:30, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>>> On 10.03.2016 09:38, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>>>>      Unless of course we decide that a system-supplied getaddrinfo (and 
>>>> inet_ntop)
>>>> is required, and remove the compat stuff completely. If that is preferred, 
>>>> I can
>>>> make a patch for it.
>>> I would think that any system you would want to run OWFS on, these days,
>>> has native support for this.
>>>
>>> Thus, IMHO we should drop it.
>>     Patch sent.
>    It seems that the patch was too large to send it to the mailing list 
> (removing
> 5 files, that's a long patch...). Is there another way I can send it? I could
> also use --irreversible-delete to make the patch smaller.
>
Cut out the contents of the files which are removed, and describe that 
in plain text instead.

Johan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to