Great! :)

On 07/04/16 20:33, Nico Bouthoorn wrote:
> I've pulled the latest master, in a fresh install.    It is working!
>
> thanks,
>
> Nico
>
> Johan Ström wrote:
>> Since this HW is out there in unknown number of deployments, it makes more 
>> sense to add a SW fix. I added a verify_mask which ignores the button 
>> pull-ups on read-back.
>>
>> Nico: Can you pull latest master and try that?
>> If 'git show HEAD' shows your revert at the top, you must first do 'git 
>> reset --hard HEAD^' (assuming you have no other uncommited changes). Then 
>> you can do 'git pull'.
>>
>> Johan
>>
>> On 03/04/16 20:30, Johan Ström wrote:
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> I've gotten some helpful off-list response from Der Tiger, and to sum it up.
>>>
>>> The hardware Tiger uses (Hobbyboard) is electrically identical to the on 
>>> Nico uses (https://fstab.nl/en/lcd_owfs), except that the Hobbyboard 
>>> schematic has 3 pushbuttons between P0..P3 and GND, with 10nF cap's in 
>>> parallel, and 3 10k pull-ups between VCC and P0..P3. The schematic Nico 
>>> uses leaves P0..P3 floating.
>>>
>>> One theory put forward by Der Tiger is that, since the patch disables the 
>>> PIO output transistors for P0..P3 and thus leaving the outputs in an 
>>> undefined state, the chip/owfs could be confused.
>>>
>>> Also, with the help of Jan's explanation on the command sequence, I cannot 
>>> really see any apparent issues with the patch.
>>>
>>> After studying the logs (which says ' Error sending initial attention'), 
>>> and the corresponding code, I'm quite sure the lacking pull-ups are the 
>>> source of the problem.
>>> OW_Hinit->OW_w_pios writes a byte and then read backs the PIO status, 
>>> expecting them to be the same. If no pull-ups are present, it will i.e 
>>> write 0x37, but read back 0x30, and fail.
>>> This is the case in the log (see below, [1]).
>>>
>>>
>>> Nico: Can you try to add some 10k resistors between P0-VCC, P1-VCC and 
>>> P3-VCC? Remember to test with the original code (without the extra revert).
>>> Hopefully that will help!
>>> Thanks to Tiger and Jan for helping to (hopefully) fix this issue :)
>>>
>>> Johan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> TRAFFIC IN  <NETREAD> bus=0 (/dev/ttyUSB0)
>>> Byte buffer DS9097U, length=1
>>> --000: 37     (Here we write  0x37)
>>>     <7>
>>> TRAFFIC IN  <NETREAD> bus=0 (/dev/ttyUSB0)
>>> Byte buffer DS9097U, length=1
>>> --000: C8
>>>     <.>
>>> TRAFFIC IN  <NETREAD> bus=0 (/dev/ttyUSB0)
>>> Byte buffer DS9097U, length=1
>>> --000: AA
>>>     <.>
>>> TRAFFIC IN  <NETREAD> bus=0 (/dev/ttyUSB0)
>>> Byte buffer DS9097U, length=1
>>> --000: 30     (Here we read back 0x30, bit 0-3 is not pulled up.)
>>>     <0>
>>>    DEBUG: ow_tcp_read.c:(113) read: 4 - 0 = 4
>>>    DEBUG: ow_transaction.c:(145) modify = 0
>>>    DEBUG: ow_transaction.c:(208) end = 0
>>>    DEBUG: ow_2408.c:(442) Error sending initial attention
>>>    DEBUG: ow_2408.c:(406) Screen initialization error
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owfs-developers mailing list
>> Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
>>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to