And no opinion against here either.. SF seems to have shaped up last day or two, but who know how long that will keep..
What are your suggestions? Move GIT only, and keep site + mailinglist on sourceforge? Releases on Github I guess? (https://help.github.com/articles/creating-releases/) Anyway, the repo is there and ready for use. So far it's only me and Jan Kandziora who have access. To get admin/member/colaborator access, we need to add you. Johan On 05/03/18 13:16, Ben Oliver wrote: > On 18-03-05 13:11:23, Matthias Urlichs via Owfs-developers wrote: >> On 05.03.2018 11:15, Stefano Miccoli wrote: >>> In my opinion it should be time to migrate the principal OWFS repo >>> from SF to GH. >> >> Seconded. SF is not going to get better, long-term. >> >> -- -- Matthias Urlichs > > Thirded. I noticed that vim is about to jump ship after loads of > issues with their site. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Owfs-developers mailing list > Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
