Am Donnerstag 24 Februar 2011, 11:14:41 schrieb Fabio Alessandro Locati: > 2011/2/24 Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <[email protected]> > > > On Wednesday 23 February 2011 15:55:02 Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > > > I would suggest to look in a MongoDB idea, because this would make the > > > sharing very efficient, easy and secure, the only downside is that we > > > > have > > > > > to implement the versioning. We could keep a db of deltas and a db with > > > > all > > > > > the 'last version' of the objects. > > > > I think Git is simpler than that. > > I saves all copies of a file. There is no need to use deltas. ;-) > > I recommend to read the chapter 9 of Pro Git: > > http://progit.org/book/ch9-0.html > > > > I think that it will be necessary to modify the way that git works > > because it > > was created to provide versions for the whole repository (like SVN) and > > not per file (like CVS) as used in other services. Anyway, this can > > simplify everything. > > The problem with git, is sharing, not the versioning ;) Why don't we investigate to implement the WebDAV sharing extension? It's described here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3253
And what is meant with "sharing"? Can we elaborate on this a bit more? I was thinking a web resource, protected by groups and user permissions is already very good at sharing? Maybe I misunderstand... regards, Klaas _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
