On 2011-02-24 Fabio wrote: > 2011/2/24 Klaas Freitag <[email protected]> > > > > The problem with git, is sharing, not the versioning ;) > > > > Why don't we investigate to implement the WebDAV sharing extension? > > It's described here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3253 > > I think that document speaks about versioning and not sharing.
Ok, maybe wrong document - but the WebDav sharing plugin for Git came up at a discussion yesterday at SCALE about artists having trouble with the complicated GIT. Having a WebDav folder (which they can just open in any KDE app or mount for non-KDE apps) where they can drop files which are then available in GIT is just awesome ;-) If OwnCloud could implement this I'm sure the openSUSE Artists would be the first to use it... ;-) > > And what is meant with "sharing"? Can we elaborate on this a bit > > more? I was > > thinking a web resource, protected by groups and user permissions > > is already > > very good at sharing? > > That's a very good question. When I speak about sharing, I think > about a system that allows me to choose with whom (persons or > groups) I would like to share a given file (or folder) and allows me > to establish how much power do they have on the file I shared (read > only, read/write, adminship). I also think about some kind of 'hot > links' that I can give to anyone I like to see for a given amount of > time (in days, time that the url is opened, etc) the document. > > Regards, > Fabio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
