> > Now look at the method I describe above using tokens (not RFC6578). > So, instead of using checksums we use server generated tokens. Now > there is no checksum overhead. So why is a checksum needed? Is it > because WebDAV does not have a way to manage these types of tokens?
I think you're not actually involved in the development of this feature, and neither am I. I don't want to spam the list, so I'm e-mailing you directly. The server doesn't need to know checksums, I agree obviously..that's what I've been saying for some time now ;) But, how would you propose the client detects that a file locally changed in your scenario? Evert _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
