On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Evert Pot wrote: >> >> Now look at the method I describe above using tokens (not RFC6578). >> So, instead of using checksums we use server generated tokens. Now >> there is no checksum overhead. So why is a checksum needed? Is it >> because WebDAV does not have a way to manage these types of tokens? > > I think you're not actually involved in the development of this feature, and > neither am I. > I don't want to spam the list, so I'm e-mailing you directly. > > The server doesn't need to know checksums, I agree obviously..that's what > I've been saying for some time now ;) > > But, how would you propose the client detects that a file locally changed in > your scenario?
Well.. looks like I sent that email to the list anyway. Sorry about that! Was trying to avoid spamming, not increase it ;) Evert _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
