Am 20.07.2012 um 15:21 schrieb Diederik de Haas: > On Friday 20 July 2012 14:57:54 Georg Ehrke wrote: >> In the update instructions is written, that the column URI has to be a >> varchar with a length of 200. Calendar uses a length of 255, so everything >> will be fine with calendar. @Thomas: Would you like to update the contacts >> app database? It uses currently varchar with a length of 100. > > Why these arbitrary short lengths for URI? > I _thought_ that the maximum length for an URI was 2048, but according to [1] > and the standard RFC 2616 [2] there is no real limit on the length of an URI, > although 2000/2048 seems to be the practical one. > > Since it looks like there needs to be a db 'conversion' anyway, why not do it > properly? A URL is not a URI. The URI (Uniform resource identifier) is a kind of an id for e.g. a contact. Evenmore, afaik a varchar's max length is (or was) 255.
Cheers, Georg > > Cheers, > Diederik > > > [1] > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/417142/what-is-the-maximum-length-of-a-url > [2] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2616.html _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
