Am 20.07.2012 um 15:35 schrieb Georg Ehrke: > Am 20.07.2012 um 15:21 schrieb Diederik de Haas: >> On Friday 20 July 2012 14:57:54 Georg Ehrke wrote: >>> In the update instructions is written, that the column URI has to be a >>> varchar with a length of 200. Calendar uses a length of 255, so everything >>> will be fine with calendar. @Thomas: Would you like to update the contacts >>> app database? It uses currently varchar with a length of 100. >> >> Why these arbitrary short lengths for URI? >> I _thought_ that the maximum length for an URI was 2048, but according to >> [1] >> and the standard RFC 2616 [2] there is no real limit on the length of an >> URI, >> although 2000/2048 seems to be the practical one. >> >> Since it looks like there needs to be a db 'conversion' anyway, why not do >> it >> properly? > A URL is not a URI. > The URI (Uniform resource identifier) is a kind of an id for e.g. a contact. > Evenmore, afaik a varchar's max length is (or was) 255. > To correct myself: Technically, a URL is a URI, but not all URIs are URLs.
> Cheers, > Georg > > >> >> Cheers, >> Diederik >> >> >> [1] >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/417142/what-is-the-maximum-length-of-a-url >> [2] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2616.html > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
