On Saturday 09 March 2013 18:05 Chris Green wrote: > > OK, I'll definitely do that as sorting by family name makes *much* more > sense. Where do I put feature requests - are they just issues?
Yep :) > > What do you mean about business names? Currently ORG and TITLE support is > > implemented https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2426#section-3.5 > > > Well it's a compromise between simplicity in the UX and supporting the rfc > > as good as possible. The current implementation parses the formatted > > display name after a basic, western style first name, additional names > > and last name and > No it doesn't, if I enter "James Smith" as the name then it's simply > filed with a Family Name of "James Smith" and all the other fields > are empty. I forgot to mention that this is in OC 5, OC 4.5.X has the behaviour you describe. > However just about every other address book I've played with has > explicit separate fields for First Name and Last Name, I think it would > be better if owncloud did the same. If you click on the small pencil icon to the right of the name, a dialog where you can edit all the fields will popup. -- Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards Thomas Tanghus _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list Owncloud@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
