Hi Peter,
Thanks for the JARV reference. We use the native API of MSV, and I will investigate if it behaves like the JARV interface as soon as time permits.
I can see the benefit of generated schema, and we will consider that feature for the next release.
I'll keep you posted on any development in this area.
Regards, Julien
--- Peter Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> Interesting, I did not realize that you used Jing for RelaxNG.
> Basically what we are trying to accomplish is supported by (we think)
> Jing See http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1675 unfortunately we
> have done a lot of modeling in W3C Schema...
>
> However, we could get an approximation of "progressive/feasible
> validation" if we could get the MSV to report errors on all elements.
> We would ignore all elements that reported errors which were not
> included in the specific input were validating.
>
> What I saw in the MSV documentation that led me to think we could do
> this is at the end of part 4-1 of the MSV documentation (JARV.html) it
> says
>
> " If you throw an exception from the error handler, that exception will
> not be catched by the verify method. So the validation is effectively
> aborted there. If you return from the error handler
> normally, then MSV will try to recover from the error and find as much
> errors as possible."
>
> I took this to mean that MSV could be configured
> (through error handling) to catch multiple errors, but I have not
> had the time to actually try it.
>
>
> OPPS, I wrote schematron-validation and I meant the
> just validation, sorry :)
>
> As for creating schemas on the fly, this could be
> useful if the partial validation approaches above fail, or are not
> powerful enough. If we could validate against a generated schema, we could
> run a transformation against the master schema picking out only the
> elements that need to be validated and use this as the input to schema input
> to validation. Though this seems like a much harder approach, I can
> see how it might be useful.
>
> I would imagine that if you allowed annotated
> validation to be accessed in the same way you do pass/fail validation, the
> ability to use generated schemas would be a freebee.
>
> Let me know if you read the MSV doc the same way I do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
_______________________________________________ oxf-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.orbeon.com/mailman/listinfo/oxf-users
