Dear Silky,

>> You know you can implement an MVC model without ASP.NET MVC, Right?
>> What the hell does it matter what Microsoft pushes? Why don't you just do
things the way *you* think is best?

I'm not sure how this became about what I know, what matters to me, or about
what I choose to do. However, I am pleased to know that you care so much
about me.

The original question asked that had ASP.NET MVC been created before
ASP.NETWeb Forms, whether people would be going crazy about Web Forms
at this
point.

My point was that ASP.NET MVC is what it is because the team made use of
certain design principles. Had they followed them from the start, they might
not have created ASP.NET Web Forms at all, because many of those principles
go fundamentally against what Web Forms is all about. It's an observation
about the journey that the ASP.NET team may have taken that might have made
the original question moot. It has nothing to do with me or my choices.

Paul





On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:12 PM, silky <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Paul Stovell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Are you really trying to suggest that the "MVC" model was
> > > invented *after* web forms?
> >
> > No. Perhaps that should have read ASP.NET MVC, though I thought that
> could
> > be assumed from the context.
>
> In context, your statement makes no sense, so I was giving you a
> chance to make some. You know you can implement an MVC model without
> ASP.NET MVC, Right? Here is Microsoft even showing you how :
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms998540.aspx
>
>
> > Let me rephrase. If Microsoft had built and
> > shipped the ASP.NET MVC framework as the Official Microsoft Way of
> building
> > web applications, prior to building and shipping ASP.NET Web Forms, then
> the
> > latter may not have even happened or would have (hopefully) turned out
> very
> > differently.
>
> What the hell does it matter what Microsoft pushes? Why don't you just
> do things the way *you* think is best? You can write anything they've
> written. I don't understand this obsession.
>
> I shouldn't even be responding to these emails; it's all so
> mind-bendingly stupid.
>
>
> > Paul
>
> --
> silky
>
>  http://www.programmingbranch.com/
>



-- 
Paul Stovell

Reply via email to