Tony,

Can you elaborate on the problems you are hitting that weren't resolved by the 
additional patches? What's some of the critical major pieces that you believe 
are missing?

I've been running VS 2010 pretty much since we started it and I can tell the 
latest builds are enormously better than the RC.

David

________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf 
of [email protected] [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:53 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Visual Studio 2010 RC

Well, I guess we'll give it a try again once the product is released, but if it 
gives us any trouble, it
won't be worth the effort and we'll pull back until service pack 1. That said, 
Microsoft often have
extra RCs internally before RTM anyway, so hopefully that has resolved most of 
the issues people
have, although it's not until it's in widespread use that people often find any 
real problems.

I still have an expectation that the process will be relatively easy - if it's 
not then the added
features won't be enough for us to upgrade unfortunately. I certainly don't 
want to lose even one
man day per person in my team just because of a shoddy release. And if it's a 
couple of days after
we've upgraded before we find real problems, then we're going to be pretty 
peeved - the rollback
to 2008 will be more painful than the upgrade I think.

On Fri, Mar 26th, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> RC seems to have lost it's meaning as most RC now are not really a
> candidate at all to be the release version. When you see RC just
> read
> Beta. I think it is unlikely there will be another RC as the final
> version is meant to be released in 2 weeks.
>
> Craig.
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been reading some of the comments on Scott Guthrie's blog, and
> there seem to be quite a few
> > people asking for an RC2 of Visual Studio 2010.  I think I agree
> with this, because I'm not
> > convinced RC1 was anything more than a Beta anyway. I mean, how
> could it really be a Release
> > Candidate if it was delivered with major pieces missing? There's
> nothing worse than having to
> > install something and then apply a whole list of patches to get it
> to behave the way you want it.
> > What a waste of time that is.
>
>
>

Reply via email to