On 20 May 2010 16:08, silky <[email protected]> wrote: > I've never been to court for a patent infringement, but I'd imagine > the *process* of showing and proving "prior art" is non-trivially > expensive.
Not if you have time machine!! Now that the idea of using time machine to show and prove "prior art" is in the open no one ever will be able to patent it! Regards Arjang
