On 20 May 2010 16:30, Arjang Assadi <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 May 2010 16:08, silky <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've never been to court for a patent infringement, but I'd imagine >> the *process* of showing and proving "prior art" is non-trivially >> expensive. > > Not if you have time machine!! > > Now that the idea of using time machine to show and prove "prior art" > is in the open no one ever will be able to patent it!
Not in a time-stream that has time-machines in it. If you contend that the introduction and use of time machines changes things, then you can. > > Regards > > Arjang > -- Meski "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
