I find Anandtech has the best coverage of SSDs, it's much more detailed and 
in-depth than Tom's Hardware for SSDs.

The SDD articles are here: http://www.anandtech.com/tag/storage
They have a handy benchmark too: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/SSD/65

The SandForce SF-2000 series drives appear to be the clear benchmark winners at 
the moment, but they are expensive and you want to ensure you have SATA3 
controller as they will easily saturate SATA2.

Ben

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Tony Wright
Sent: Friday, 13 May 2011 10:28 AM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: SSD minimum size question

Personally I decided on the 256G. And I've got the same for 3 laptops now. I 
don't want to have to waste my time dealing with the possibility of running out 
of space.

BTW, there are a number of 3rd gen SSDs out now, not just the Crucial M4, 
although they use newer technology which is apparently not as good (cheaper but 
not better performing). Some of the 2nd gen drives are pretty awesome if you 
can get them for a good price, such as the Crucial C300 (the only 2nd gen I 
would buy)
I read the following forum on tom's hardware.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/266789-32-foot-race-vertex3-intel-crucial
And a comparison site written in French (no I can't read it but google 
translate is my friend. If you know of a better comparison, please post it as 
I'm interested)
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/830-7/comparatif-ssd-2011-crucial-m4-ocz-vertex-3-intel-510-320.html

T.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Matt Siebert
Sent: Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:22 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: SSD minimum size question

I got a 120 GB SSD about 2 months ago (107 GB usable) and have been running 
with around 43 GB free space for most of that time.

I'm careful to keep my documents and photos on another drive but I do have a 
frequently used XP VM on there occupying about 8 GB.

If I did a cleanup I could probably get away with a 60 GB drive if I had to, 
but for a development machine I'd really want 120 GB.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Ian Thomas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Incidentally, Windows 7 SP1 now installs OK on his system.
It's a pity that the installer didn't give an appropriate message, instead of 
just terminating with some unrelated or incomprehensible message. How hard is 
it to say "you're out of disk space, dude"?
I wouldn't have thought a 60Gb SSD was too small, though.
________________________________

Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia

________________________________
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On 
Behalf Of Ian Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 2:18 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: SSD minimum size question

We were looking for something like that, Joseph - I'll pass it on. Wading 
through the Power Settings didn't make that clear.
(just found the same advice from Hanselman, too)
________________________________

Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia


This email is intended for the named recipient only.  The information it 
contains may be confidential or commercially sensitive.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of this email, 
disclose its contents to any other party, or take any action in reliance on it. 
 If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender 
immediately and delete the message from your computer.

Reply via email to