>If you're not going to use it to release stuff commercially, the development >(self made) certificate would do you, wouldn't it?
Well, I’m not releasing stuff under my name, but I am under the names of people I contract to. In theory they should all have certificates, and I’ve mentioned the matter in passing, but they don’t bother with such technical details that just mean more costs. http://www.source-code.biz/snippets/vbasic/3.htm I played with self-certs many years ago and I recall they didn’t behave like real ones and were quite irritating. Maybe they’re better now and useful for simply “stamping” my name into apps, but there is no root certifier of course and would expect some weird message at runtime when I use them to make claims. If I find anything interesting I’ll let you know. Greg
