>> Could it require ASP.NET 1.1 not 2.0?
Anything is possible. 

I have an old XP Pro desktop that I used for Delphi development.
It has vs2003 installed.
I might take a copy across if the machine still boots up.

Looking at the mess resulting from mixing HTML, VB and JavaScript up
together makes me feel ill.

Regards Peter Maddin
Applications Development Officer
PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA
Phone : +618 6396 4285 (Monday, Wednesday,Friday)
Phone : +618 9346 4372 (Tuesday, Thursday)
Mobile: 0423 540 825 
E-Mail : [email protected]; [email protected]
The contents of this e-mail transmission outside of the WAGHS network are
intended solely for the named recipient's), may be confidential, and may be
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure in the public interest.
The use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution of the contents of this
e-mail transmission by any person other than the named recipient(s) is
prohibited. If you are not a named recipient please notify the sender
immediately.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Mark Hurd
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2011 3:11 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: ASP.NET web site

Could it require ASP.NET 1.1 not 2.0?

-- Regards,Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.)(Hons.)
On 14 December 2011 16:52, Peter Maddin <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is what I first thought, so I checked up on some asp examples.
>
> It does not look like asp so I suppose it must be asp.net using vb.net
just
> really really old.
>
> Regards Peter Maddin
> Applications Development Officer
> PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA
> Phone : +618 6396 4285 (Monday, Wednesday,Friday)
>
> Phone : +618 9346 4372 (Tuesday, Thursday)
> Mobile: 0423 540 825
> E-Mail : [email protected]; [email protected]
> The contents of this e-mail transmission outside of the WAGHS network are
> intended solely for the named recipient's), may be confidential, and may
be
> privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure in the public interest.
> The use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution of the contents of this
> e-mail transmission by any person other than the named recipient(s) is
> prohibited. If you are not a named recipient please notify the sender
> immediately.

Reply via email to