Thanks
>> Yeah that is a 1.1 vb web page

I suspected as much.

>> looks like it was either a wizard conversion from asp to asp.net,

It does look like a converted asp application. I actually checked out some
asp examples in order to compare asp code with what I was looking at.

>> Try turning option explicit off and option strict off in the project
properties.

I'll give that a try.

>> My first reaction, is scrap it and rewrite

I could not agree more but the powers that be would prefer one to maintain
what's there and avoid a rewrite if possible.

>> Which is the reason I decided not to do vb.net and do c# instead.

I also decided not to use vb.net and go with C#. Have not regretted that
decision until I was landed with this.

Regards Peter Maddin
Applications Development Officer
PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA
Phone : +618 6396 4285 (Monday, Wednesday,Friday)
Phone : +618 9346 4372 (Tuesday, Thursday)
Mobile: 0423 540 825 
E-Mail : [email protected]; [email protected]
The contents of this e-mail transmission outside of the WAGHS network are
intended solely for the named recipient's), may be confidential, and may be
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure in the public interest.
The use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution of the contents of this
e-mail transmission by any person other than the named recipient(s) is
prohibited. If you are not a named recipient please notify the sender
immediately.
 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2011 3:20 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: ASP.NET web site

Yeah that is a 1.1 vb web page, to do that now you need to write it as a
handler. 

Try turning option explicit off and option strict off in the project
properties.

My first reaction, is scrap it and rewrite, it looks like it was either a
wizard conversion from asp to asp.net, or the original developer thought
that vb.net was the same as vb/vbscript. Which is the reason I decided not
to do vb.net and do c# instead. 

Davy
   
------Original Message------
From: Mark Hurd
Sender: [email protected]
To: ozDotNet
ReplyTo: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: ASP.NET web site
Sent: 14 Dec 2011 08:11

Could it require ASP.NET 1.1 not 2.0?

-- Regards,Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.)(Hons.)
On 14 December 2011 16:52, Peter Maddin <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is what I first thought, so I checked up on some asp examples.
>
> It does not look like asp so I suppose it must be asp.net using vb.net
just
> really really old.
>
> Regards Peter Maddin
> Applications Development Officer
> PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA
> Phone : +618 6396 4285 (Monday, Wednesday,Friday)
>
> Phone : +618 9346 4372 (Tuesday, Thursday)
> Mobile: 0423 540 825
> E-Mail : [email protected]; [email protected]
> The contents of this e-mail transmission outside of the WAGHS network are
> intended solely for the named recipient's), may be confidential, and may
be
> privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure in the public interest.
> The use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution of the contents of this
> e-mail transmission by any person other than the named recipient(s) is
> prohibited. If you are not a named recipient please notify the sender
> immediately.


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Reply via email to