Thanks for the feedback. On the three different versions things, why are you using three? What you building that still requires 2005/2008?
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mike smith Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 9:35 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: New look of Visual Studio, what are your thoughts? On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:15 PM, David Kean <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > We showed off the new look today: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/ > > > > Thoughts? I agree, somewhat, about the colour, but feel you've gone too far towards monochrome. And if you make me learn a new set of damned icons, I won't use the bloody thing. This is one thing I wish Microsoft would stop tinkering with. Icons, menu layouts, dialog layouts. Some of us don't move on completely from one version to another, but use 3 different versions of VS. Do you have any idea how painful this is? [Description: Pictographic icons from VS 2010 on the top row with the equivalent VS 11 glyphs on the bottom row] Take the comment/uncomment icons. WTF are they meant to represent? </rant> -- Meski http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
<<inline: image001.png>>
