Seconded on different versions thing. 

Switching between 2010 and 2008 little  changes in menus really slow me down. 
Doing >of classname  in 2010 with the auto complete is very very annoying. 

(4.0, vsto projects and the frankinapp that's been converted from 
vs,2003,2005,2008)  

Davy .02€
Hexed into a portable ouija board. 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Kean <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:58:26 
To: ozDotNet<[email protected]>
Reply-To: ozDotNet <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: New look of Visual Studio, what are your thoughts?

Thanks for the feedback. On the three different versions things, why are you 
using three? What you building that still requires 2005/2008?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of mike smith
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 9:35 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: New look of Visual Studio, what are your thoughts?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:15 PM, David Kean 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> We showed off the new look today: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/
>
>
>
> Thoughts?

I agree, somewhat, about the colour, but feel you've gone too far towards 
monochrome.  And if you make me learn a new set of damned icons, I won't use 
the bloody thing.  This is one thing I wish Microsoft would stop tinkering 
with.  Icons, menu layouts, dialog layouts.   Some of us don't move on 
completely from one version to another, but use 3 different versions of VS.  Do 
you have any idea how painful this is?

[Description: Pictographic icons from VS 2010 on the top row with the 
equivalent VS 11 glyphs on the bottom row]

Take the comment/uncomment icons. WTF are they meant to represent?

</rant>



--
Meski

 http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll 
get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills

<<inline: image001.png>>

Reply via email to