Really? You need Ultimate to use Fakes? That sucks. We're also using Moles at my workplace.
On 20 August 2012 22:28, <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I was bummed when I learned that Fakes required Ultimate. > > I'd used Moles from MS Research, for working with SharePoint, and was > hoping to migrate to Fakes. Even with all the MSDN licenses at the client, > they would not have had enough Ultimates to cover the developers and the > build machines. They can probably still use Moles, but it looks like a dead > end since the site claims the Fakes will replace Moles. > > It may be a better deal, financially, to license Telerik JustMocks or > Typemock Isolator. Both are nicer to work with than Moles, I can't speak > for Fakes. > > BTW, Moles was the pre-cursor to MS Fakes - see: > http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/moles/ > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Shims > From: Stephen Price <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, August 20, 2012 5:09 am > To: ozDotNet <[email protected]> > > Hey all, > > Has anyone had a look at Shims yet? The documentation says it required > VS2012 Ultimate. I got all excited when I read about Shims and then my > hopes were dashed. Ultimate? Can't afford that for a sole developer. *sigh* > > cheers, > Stephen > >
