It was also posted on uservoice.com http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/2919309-provide-microsoft-fakes-with-all-visual-studio-edi
On 21 August 2012 10:40, William Luu <[email protected]> wrote: > Really? You need Ultimate to use Fakes? That sucks. > > We're also using Moles at my workplace. > > > On 20 August 2012 22:28, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, I was bummed when I learned that Fakes required Ultimate. >> >> I'd used Moles from MS Research, for working with SharePoint, and was >> hoping to migrate to Fakes. Even with all the MSDN licenses at the client, >> they would not have had enough Ultimates to cover the developers and the >> build machines. They can probably still use Moles, but it looks like a dead >> end since the site claims the Fakes will replace Moles. >> >> It may be a better deal, financially, to license Telerik JustMocks or >> Typemock Isolator. Both are nicer to work with than Moles, I can't speak >> for Fakes. >> >> BTW, Moles was the pre-cursor to MS Fakes - see: >> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/moles/ >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Shims >> From: Stephen Price <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, August 20, 2012 5:09 am >> To: ozDotNet <[email protected]> >> >> Hey all, >> >> Has anyone had a look at Shims yet? The documentation says it required >> VS2012 Ultimate. I got all excited when I read about Shims and then my >> hopes were dashed. Ultimate? Can't afford that for a sole developer. *sigh* >> >> cheers, >> Stephen >> >> >
