I would have thought by now virus / security for mainstream issues has been
streamlined given companies also are opting in for the "BYOD" scenarios?

---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote:

>  No enterprise I’ve ever done work for uses the in-built Microsoft
> virus/malware tools because there are no central management tools for them
> (you have to go to Forefront Endpoint Protection/SCEP instead). The license
> for Microsoft Security Essentials (from memory) prohibits you from using it
> orgs with more than 10 users anyway.****
>
> ** **
>
> Secondly, most enterprise end point protection tools do FW, AV, HIPS, NAC
> etc in one tool, with one reporting console. ****
>
> ** **
>
> That’s why hardly anyone (to date) in big orgs uses the Microsoft stuff.**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers****
>
> Ken****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
> *Sent:* Friday, 19 April 2013 11:46 AM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?****
>
> ** **
>
> Don't disagree i put all of that under the SOE readiness banner.. I have
> seen a few organisations that use AV as a blocking issue for migration as
> assuming you get all the other change management protocols under control if
> the slightest hint of "Your computers aren't protected" appears they in
> turn pounce on it.****
>
> ** **
>
> I've also seen a fight break out or two electronically over the merits of
> adopting a 3rd party virus scanner over the inbuilt one within Windows 8
> given the total amount of "patterns" aren't int he 90's+ compared to the
> inbuilt one being in the 60s+... I think the end was that the Windows 8
> didn't cover off all virus's given that most of the virus's that aren't
> being covered dont "exist" anymore or have not shown any signs
> of reappearing or rely on old ways to breach the OS ...****
>
>
> ****
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes
> http://www.riagenic.com****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
>  AV clients aren’t a blocker for most enterprise client migrations.
> Usually the blocker is the huge cost involved, due to the large number of
> people involved in getting the release out****
>
>  ****
>
> -          Need to go and gather requirements from many business units****
>
> -          Need to go and find out all the differences (e.g. new security
> settings/defaults) between the old platform and the new one, and then get
> the security group (and regulators etc.) to sign off on the new proposed
> standard****
>
> -          Need to do sociability testing of all the base infrastructure
> (including end-point protection, but also VPN clients, monitoring tools,
> deployment tools, asset tracking tools, provisioning tools, procurement
> tools)****
>
> -          Need to do sociability testing of business apps (e.g. a big
> bank will have hundreds of apps)****
>
> -          Need to create the necessary builds, scripts etc. and update
> deployment infrastructure to cater for the new platform.****
>
> -          Need to validate which hardware models the new build will
> actually work on, and work to retire the rest****
>
> -          Need to work out how to migrate existing user data during the
> upgrade process****
>
> -          Need to get all the necessary support in place (e.g. floor
> walkers), plus user guides / self-help training etc, negotiate roll out
> schedules with business units blah blah****
>
>  ****
>
> For really big orgs, with hundreds of thousands of seats, you never really
> finish one upgrade before you’re already planning the next one. The
> end-point protection client is probably the least of the issues.****
>
>  ****
>
> Cheers****
>
> Ken****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 17 April 2013 6:05 PM****
>
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?****
>
>  ****
>
> The reality is most Enterprises that have moved to Windows 7 aren't likely
> to rush out again on Windows 8, they'll probably want the dust to settle
> and lot of time the stalling point for migration between Operating Systems
> isn't just SOE red-tape its often because Virus scanners themselves haven't
> gotten their act together to produce a solid build for the latest edition
> (i'm looking at you Symantec) ..... oh yes despite their being a built-in
> Virus scanner in Windows 8....****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ** **
>

Reply via email to