Nice quote.  Google says it's *skeuomorphism *though.  (what kind of
language puts euo in that order???)

Mike

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote:

> iOS7 is what happeneded the night of Steve Jobs funeral as they all sat in
> a bar listening to Whitesnake (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOJk0HW_hJw)
> doing lines of cocaine and suddenly reliving your 80's and after then
> upgrading your digital skuemorphism to the next circle of design hell ...
> 80's iOS ..it's the mullet Steve would have wanted.
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes
> http://www.riagenic.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, mike smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't get Apple design.  How could the designers of OSX have come up
>> with a dog like iOS?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> VS2012 design could have been worse.. Apple could have designed it :)
>>>
>>>
>>> http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/780667831.jpg?1371031013
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Regards,
>>> Scott Barnes
>>> http://www.riagenic.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ian Thomas <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Greg, Greg – I put it down to the UIX guru / fiend that obviously
>>>> exerted great influence over the PMs and higher-ups in Microsoft. ****
>>>>
>>>> I can’t stand Office 2013 – I appreciate some features, but find some
>>>> of the behaviours and the UI itself just counter-productive (ie, anti my
>>>> productivity). I don’t think I am resistant to change. I removed it, in
>>>> favour of Office 2010 (incidentally, I never used Office2007 and took to
>>>> the ribbon OK). ****
>>>>
>>>> There is another VS2012 hack that I omitted – NiceVS. It overlaps with
>>>> one of the other hacks that I listed. ****
>>>>
>>>> NiceVS****
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/a36021f0-770a-4258-854e-724e9d12b8a6
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> I hate to have to do these things. ****
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> **Ian Thomas**
>>>> Victoria Park, ****Western Australia********
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Greg Keogh
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 15, 2013 9:30 AM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* ozDotNet
>>>> *Subject:* Re: VS2012 hacks****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> Ian (et al), I have also taken a lot of steps recently to restore
>>>> old colours and behaviour to recent Microsoft product releases. I don't
>>>> normally do that. We all expect complaints when new versions of products
>>>> are released, but in my experience the noise quickly drops away and people
>>>> just accept the changes and run with them. However, the amount of stubborn
>>>> resistance recently has been quite startling. Why is this happening?***
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft is dragging us all along with it on some sort of global style
>>>> change where there is less chrome, fewer borders, less saturated colour,
>>>> fewer lines, etc. Now I can honestly understand this because the eye and
>>>> brain work better with less clutter, but it all seems to have gone too far
>>>> (remember the first preview of Visual Studio 2012 that looked like a
>>>> charcoal etching?). Is there some department or research within Microsoft
>>>> that is driving this trend? Do they explain their reasoning? Where did they
>>>> recruit the drugged gibbons they put through the usability testing?****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> And then there's Windows 8 ...****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Greg****
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Meski
>>
>>    http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv
>>
>> "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure,
>> you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
>>
>
>


-- 
Meski

 http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure,
you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills

Reply via email to