but.. never quarrel with the man who eats ink by the barrel .... wait.. :D

---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com


On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Joseph Cooney <[email protected]>wrote:

> Re: taking Murdoch to court..."never quarrel with a man who buys ink by
> the barrel."
> On 5 Sep 2013 10:07, "Scott Barnes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> He won't get the numbers and this morning I was in a cafe eating
>> breakfast and saw him on Sunrise talking about how he's going to take
>> Murdoch to court for slander.. and even still I sit there thinking "this
>> guy has to be given a seat in the senate ...if only to make question time
>> more energetic to watch..." :)
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Regards,
>> Scott Barnes
>> http://www.riagenic.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  There are multiple ways to cook an egg. Clive’s policy platform isn’t
>>> necessarily the best one.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Pro “free market” (as opposed to “pro-business) is what’s generally best
>>> for *consumers* (even though it’s not good for an individual business),
>>> whereas business people tend to become “rent seekers” lobbying for favours
>>> for their industries. Adam Smith noted something similar ~300 years ago in
>>> the Wealth of Nations, and nothing’s changed.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Silvio Berlusconi is an example of a successful businessman who’s
>>> “pro-business” attitude didn’t really extend to making life better for the
>>> general population.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Cheers****
>>>
>>> Ken ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Paul Evrat
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 5 September 2013 8:37 AM
>>>
>>> *To:* 'ozDotNet'
>>> *Subject:* RE: [OT] NBN revisited****
>>>
>>>  ** **
>>>
>>> Any pro-business force in parliament can only be good for the country.
>>> If business isn’t doing well we can’t afford anything else .. ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Tony Wright
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 5 September 2013 7:52 AM
>>> *To:* 'ozDotNet'
>>> *Subject:* RE: [OT] NBN revisited****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Oh I thought the only people ridiculous enough to vote for him were
>>> Queenslanders.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 4 September 2013 10:02 PM
>>> *To:* ozDotNet
>>> *Subject:* Re: [OT] NBN revisited****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Is anyone else just a little bit curious to see Clive Palmer in
>>> Parliament House or is that just me..****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I mean the comedic value alone is worth it
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, wrote:****
>>>
>>>  Well said…I believe Julian Assange would get my vote..i see honesty in
>>> him…mmm..that could bring a change!****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> Anthony****
>>>
>>> Melbourne StuffUps…learn from others, share with others!****
>>>
>>> http://www.meetup.com/Melbourne-Ideas-Incubator-Stuffups-Failed-Startups/
>>> ****
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> NOTICE : The information contained in this electronic mail message is
>>> privileged and confidential, and is intended only for use of the addressee.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>> disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication
>>> is strictly prohibited.
>>> If you have received this communication in error, please notify the
>>> sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or
>>> disclosing it. (*13POrtC*)
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tony Wright
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 4 September 2013 6:02 PM
>>> *To:* 'ozDotNet'
>>> *Subject:* RE: [OT] NBN revisited****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> Wow, he didn’t even know what the policies of his party were. I think I
>>> know them better than he does!****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> What are the 6 points of the 6 point Stop The Boats plan****
>>>
>>> “Er, the first one is stop the boats”****
>>>
>>> What are the other 5 points?****
>>>
>>> “Er we plan to stop the boats”****
>>>
>>> No, the other 5 points?****
>>>
>>> “Er we plan to stop the boats”****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> He should have said, well, so it’s a 6 point plan but all 6 points are
>>> to stop the boats.****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> What a vacuous bunch of pollie we have.****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> Are these people worth $5? That’s how much our first preference vote is
>>> worth together for the upper and lower house. I don’t think they’re worth
>>> it. Mine isn’t going to Liberal or Labor. I’m finding someone closer to
>>> what I believe in and voting for them first and then voting for the party I
>>> want in. Why reward such mediocrity?****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *[email protected]
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 4 September 2013 4:11 PM
>>> *To:* 'ozDotNet'
>>> *Subject:* RE: [OT] NBN revisited****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> Full interview of Jaymes Diaz, Liberal Candidate for 
>>> Greenway<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrQPXXHUilU>
>>> this is pretty funny and disturbing video!****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> This guy is pretty useless..this politick has no idea about anything…its
>>> just  a job he is going for…how do these people get into such roles…****
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> Regards,
>>> Scott Barnes
>>> http://www.riagenic.com****
>>>
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2013.0.3392 / Virus Database: 3222/6636 - Release Date: 09/03/13
>>> ****
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to