On a related note, Dropbox used C++ for their Android/iOS apps -
http://oleb.net/blog/2014/05/how-dropbox-uses-cplusplus-cross-platform-development/


On 24 October 2014 15:22, Michael Ridland <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> http://ionicframework.com/
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Michael Ridland <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> ... but that said, Xamarin is pretty heavy weight, it's s big learning
>> curve.. if you want something lightweight and 'pretty' good you should try
>> out Ionic...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Michael Ridland <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Go Xamarin it's the best! (Opinion may be bias www.michaelridland.com)
>>>
>>> Traditional Xamarin (Native API) as the platform is awesome and solid
>>> and fast, the IDE and some of the tools around it can be a bit buggy.
>>> Xamarin.Forms is pretty early, and can be frustrating but I have build some
>>> XPlat app pretty rapidly with it.
>>>
>>> Actually I'm doing a 'Introduction to Xamarin' at SydMobile in a few
>>> weeks, you should come along I'd love to answer any questions you have.
>>> http://www.meetup.com/SydMobile/
>>>
>>> Below is a unpublished blog post on why you should use Xamarin...
>>>
>>> *Should I use Xamarin for Mobile Development? YES you should!*
>>>
>>> In my opinion you'd be insane if you didn't use Xamarin for mobile
>>> development. Many people don't know what they're missing out on by not
>>> using Xamarin so I'm going to highlight some reasons I think people
>>> should be using Xamarin.
>>> 1) It's Native but with 80%+ code share?
>>>
>>> So for those that aren't aware of Xamarin or how it works, Xamarin allows
>>> you to develop apps for iOS, Android and Mac from a single code base. When
>>> I say this I don't mean in a webview or customised API, it actually usesthe
>>> Native APIs. So when developing you use UITableView which is the same
>>> API that a native developer would be using.
>>> 2) C# and F# are Modern languages
>>>
>>> C# might not be the hipster language of the year it is a continually
>>> evolving language with solid features like type interference, dynamic
>>> types,  language integrated query (LINQ), async/await and first class
>>> functions. C# is designed for developing large robust applications.
>>>
>>> And for the functional types there's F#, which from what I've been told
>>> it's like scala but faster and better thought out.
>>>
>>> I'd argue they're better languages than java, javascript and
>>> objective-c... and seeing that they're currently the only languages with
>>> built in async you could say their even better than swift...
>>> 3) async/await
>>>
>>> .. 'wait but javascript is all async' i hear you say...  C#/F#
>>> async/await is different to what people normally think async is. C#/F#
>>> async/await tackles the callback hell problems in rich clients, anyone who
>>> works with rich clients will know of these problems. This is a problem
>>> that's attempted to be solved with promises and generators but neither are
>>> at the level of async/await.
>>>
>>> Here's a little before/after sample:
>>>
>>> *Before:*
>>>
>>> doAsync1(function () {
>>>
>>>   doAsync2(function () {
>>>
>>>      doAsync3(function () {
>>>
>>>         doAsync4(function () {
>>>       })
>>>      })
>>>    })
>>> })
>>>
>>> *After:*
>>>
>>> await doAsync1()
>>> await doAsync2()
>>> await doAsync3()
>>> await doAsync4()
>>> 4) Watches, Google Glass wearables and the future of devices.
>>>
>>> In case you haven't noticed the future isn't just mobiles it's
>>> wearables, devices and IOT. Xamarin has same day support for all these
>>> platforms including android wear, google glass, Amazon TV and more. As I've
>>> said beforeXamarin uses the Native APIs and compiles down to native
>>> so using Xamarin you're in the perfect position develop all modern
>>> platforms.
>>> 5) It's ready now!
>>>
>>> All the time I hear people say 'html is a fast moving target' or 'it
>>> will get there eventually'. Xamarin is here now, it's Native and it's
>>> cross platform. Why wait to have a great app when you can have it now and
>>> as a bonus know that your application is future proof for future devices.
>>> 6) It's fast and stable
>>>
>>> From personal experience the Xamarin traditional (Xamarin.iOS and
>>> Xamarin.Android) platform is solid, fast and stable. You'd be hard
>>> pressed to find a problem with the core parts of the platform, any app bugs
>>> will probably be your own bugs.
>>> 7) Documentation
>>>
>>> The documentation for Xamarin is solid, it's generally better than the
>>> Apple and Android documentation.
>>> 8) Xamarin.Forms
>>>
>>> So how about 100% codeshare and still be Native? Xamarin.Forms allows
>>> you to program against a single API and have that single API mapped to
>>> native controls on each platform. Hanselman describes it well, 'Write Once
>>> Run Everywhere AND Be Native'.
>>>
>>> It's still early days for the product but the top component developers
>>> like Telerik and DevExpress are already developing components for
>>> Xamarin.Forms.
>>> 9) It's the best of all worlds (Hybrid and Native)
>>>
>>> If you've taken a look at my Xamarin mashup blog
>>> <http://www.michaelridland.com/mobile/asp-net-mvc-xamarin-mashups/> you'd
>>> already know that the possibilities with Xamarin are vast, you can
>>> essential create your own Cordova and you can completely integrate it with
>>> your C# Mvvm/c# Native Code. So you have the full power of the .net
>>> framework to build your client application architecture which becomes very
>>> useful when you have complex requirements like Offline.
>>> 10) Large Community
>>>
>>> Xamarin uses the .net framework and because of this it's inherited the
>>> pre-existing community, this means that even though it's a fairly new
>>> platform we already have support for Awesome projects like Json.net, Fody
>>> and ReactiveExtensions/ReactiveUI.
>>> 11) Profitable Innovative Company
>>>
>>> Xamarin as a company has a passion for enabling mobile developers to
>>> deliver leading experiences. Their products cost money Yes but it's good
>>> for us, I see many people complain about the pricing but Xamarin charging
>>> money for products allows them to put money back into building amazing
>>> products for us. This year at EvolveXamarin released some great new
>>> products, a Analytics Cloud Service, a faster Android emulator and a
>>> performance profiler. In the future Xamarin is on the rise and this
>>> means our tools are only going to get better and better.
>>>
>>> This is why I choose Xamarin and I think you should too....
>>>
>>> If you have any questions regarding Xamarin or need any help please
>>> contact me I'm always happy to help.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Stuart Kinnear <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've got a bit of free time so I'm starting to play around with mobile
>>>> development and getting somewhat bewildered with the options offered.
>>>>
>>>> The dream is to knock up a business style app that will allow
>>>> persistence of data to the local database eg. sqlite then a transfer to a
>>>> base server.
>>>>
>>>> Looked at Android dev kit, and that is OK but of course that strikes
>>>> out Ios & Windows.
>>>>
>>>> Looked at PhoneGap/Cordova and got infuriated by the simple task of
>>>> posting data (jsonp is a bit of a security risk in my books)
>>>>
>>>> Early last year I did play with Xamarin and found it unstable, crashing
>>>> at a whim. Is it worth giving it another go, or should I just suck it up
>>>> and work on platform specific development tools.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Stuart Kinnear
>>>> Mobile: 040 704 5686.   Office: 03 9589 6502
>>>>
>>>> SK Pro-Active! Pty Ltd
>>>> acn. 81 072 778 262
>>>> PO Box 6082 Cromer, Vic 3193. Australia
>>>>
>>>> Business software developers.
>>>> SQL Server, Visual Basic, C# , Asp.Net, Microsoft Office.
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to