> > It’s interesting to read the comments, and the Microsoft replies – about > what is currently missing from “universal” and why Silverlight is more > suitable, at present. >
Good grief! I didn't previously scroll down to see those comments. I don't think this migration to WinRT should have been announced until all of the glaring omissions were available. Alarms, reminders, copy-paste, local database, WCF (they must be kidding, or can't talk to anything)... The whole RT and winmd files thing leaves me bewildered by more divergence and too many choices, everything is fragmenting without a clear goal in sight. Has anyone got anything nice to say about "universal apps"?-- *Greg K*
