On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Price <step...@perthprojects.com> wrote:
> Universal apps are lovely. > > there you go. > LOL > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Greg Keogh <g...@mira.net> wrote: > >> It’s interesting to read the comments, and the Microsoft replies – about >>> what is currently missing from “universal” and why Silverlight is more >>> suitable, at present. >>> >> >> Good grief! I didn't previously scroll down to see those comments. I >> don't think this migration to WinRT should have been announced until all of >> the glaring omissions were available. Alarms, reminders, copy-paste, local >> database, WCF (they must be kidding, or can't talk to anything)... The >> whole RT and winmd files thing leaves me bewildered by more divergence and >> too many choices, everything is fragmenting without a clear goal in sight. >> Has anyone got anything nice to say about "universal apps"?-- *Greg K* >> > >
