Because the functionality of setting up and installing a Windows
Service is almost "out-of-the-box" available now, and has been
available fairly easily since the start of the .NET Framework AFAIR,
I'd go for that if at all possible.

We have a range of "agents" that require a console to auto-logon so
they can run. (The agents are still VB6-based but they implement
interfaces and, via COM, run .NET assemblies.)

If I was starting from scratch, I'd use Windows Services, probably
with a "management" UI available from an external process triggered
from a System Tray icon.

-- 
Regards,
Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.)(Hons.)

On 11 November 2015 at 14:46, Greg Keogh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Howdy again, I'm thinking aloud about a problem here in case there is
> lateral thinking available.
>
> We have a mature app that uses a single-file database that is locked. Now
> new apps want to use this file as well, but how can they share it? The usual
> fix would be to (1) Migrate it into something like SQL Server (2) Wrap the
> file in code in a different process and expose it as a service.
>
> Option 1 has too many dependencies that aren't available. Option 2 is easy
> to code, but you have to manage the lifetime of the process and perhaps make
> it a Windows Service, which makes a bigger install and runtime footprint.
>
> At the moment I'm wondering if the "service" could be a hidden console or
> WinForms app that is registered in HKLM Run, or similar. That way it's a
> "fake lightweight service".
>
> Greg K

Reply via email to