[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> * Letters to the Editor (24/1/02)*
>
> Thursday, 24 January 2002
>
>
> *These women likely to need caesareans*
> DR BARBARA VERNON of the Maternity Coalition (CT, Letters, January 17) 
> disagrees in part with the sentiments of Dr Heather Munro upon her 
> retirement. As you might expect I find myself totally in agreement 
> with Dr Munro, as I imagine would most practising obstetricians.
>
> Since a large number of well educated women, particularly the older 
> ones or those with particularly precious pregnancies 

what constitutes a 'particularly precious pregnancy'? & how is one child 
(or one womans birth experience) more 'precious' than another?

> who are more likely to require caesareans, tend to go to experienced 
> private obstetricians for their confinement, Dr Vernon is committing 
> (presumably deliberately) the first sin of statistics, namely, the 
> presentation of data derived from the comparison of dissimilar groups.
> M. A. STAFFORD-BELL
> Deakin
> *More seeking intervention*
> AS A GP who practised obstetrics for over 25 years I take issue with 
> the letter of Dr Barbara Vernon (CT, January 17).
>
> Many women are choosing intervention. Some are primigravidas (first 
> pregnancies) and have heard about the terrors of labour. 

yeah the good ole' "terrors of labour". and who the hell are they 
hearing about these from? (ps. are they anything like the "dogs of 
war"?damn it, from now on I'll always think of them as the terriers of 
labour)

> Others have experienced a difficult labour and do not wish to do so again.

yeah I wonder why...........

> In either case, a vaginal delivery would be desirable from the 
> obstetric viewpoint but in this day of choice they insist on (and 
> receive) a caesarean section.

um, yeah & all the breech babies, the 'your baby is far too big for your 
pelvis (& ends up being 1.5 kg under the obs guess)'  situations, the 'I 
dont want to come back at 2am so we'll do a c/s now at 6pm so I can go 
home for dinner' jobs, and my personal favourite, the referral to the ob 
who is so shit-scared of any woman in her power that they will do 
anything to 'help' her out of it.

>
> Obstetricians do not intervene for other than good, sound, medical 
> reasons (with the exception stated above). 

hallo, what planet have you just come from? oh sorry I dint realise that 
making the repayments on the BMW, the 2 storey waterfront 'bungalow' and 
the yearly overseas trip constituted 'good sound medical reasons'.

>
> Dr ALAN D. SHROOT
> Aranda

yes I know Im shooting from the hip here, dont flame me, just feeling 
particly cynical 2day, I'll get over it :)
jennifairy

>


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to