I was wondering how he came to the conclusion that some pregnancies are more
precious than others.

I thought they paid cash (after receiving payment for each c-sect) for their
acquisitions :-)


----- Original Message -----
From: Jenni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: More from the CT - The OB's have their say..........


> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > * Letters to the Editor (24/1/02)*
> >
> > Thursday, 24 January 2002
> >
> >
> > *These women likely to need caesareans*
> > DR BARBARA VERNON of the Maternity Coalition (CT, Letters, January 17)
> > disagrees in part with the sentiments of Dr Heather Munro upon her
> > retirement. As you might expect I find myself totally in agreement
> > with Dr Munro, as I imagine would most practising obstetricians.
> >
> > Since a large number of well educated women, particularly the older
> > ones or those with particularly precious pregnancies
>
> what constitutes a 'particularly precious pregnancy'? & how is one child
> (or one womans birth experience) more 'precious' than another?
>
> > who are more likely to require caesareans, tend to go to experienced
> > private obstetricians for their confinement, Dr Vernon is committing
> > (presumably deliberately) the first sin of statistics, namely, the
> > presentation of data derived from the comparison of dissimilar groups.
> > M. A. STAFFORD-BELL
> > Deakin
> > *More seeking intervention*
> > AS A GP who practised obstetrics for over 25 years I take issue with
> > the letter of Dr Barbara Vernon (CT, January 17).
> >
> > Many women are choosing intervention. Some are primigravidas (first
> > pregnancies) and have heard about the terrors of labour.
>
> yeah the good ole' "terrors of labour". and who the hell are they
> hearing about these from? (ps. are they anything like the "dogs of
> war"?damn it, from now on I'll always think of them as the terriers of
> labour)
>
> > Others have experienced a difficult labour and do not wish to do so
again.
>
> yeah I wonder why...........
>
> > In either case, a vaginal delivery would be desirable from the
> > obstetric viewpoint but in this day of choice they insist on (and
> > receive) a caesarean section.
>
> um, yeah & all the breech babies, the 'your baby is far too big for your
> pelvis (& ends up being 1.5 kg under the obs guess)'  situations, the 'I
> dont want to come back at 2am so we'll do a c/s now at 6pm so I can go
> home for dinner' jobs, and my personal favourite, the referral to the ob
> who is so shit-scared of any woman in her power that they will do
> anything to 'help' her out of it.
>
> >
> > Obstetricians do not intervene for other than good, sound, medical
> > reasons (with the exception stated above).
>
> hallo, what planet have you just come from? oh sorry I dint realise that
> making the repayments on the BMW, the 2 storey waterfront 'bungalow' and
> the yearly overseas trip constituted 'good sound medical reasons'.
>
> >
> > Dr ALAN D. SHROOT
> > Aranda
>
> yes I know Im shooting from the hip here, dont flame me, just feeling
> particly cynical 2day, I'll get over it :)
> jennifairy
>
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to